Monday, 24 June 2013

MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECTS OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION

J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol 2010; 10(1)
Editorial
MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECTS OF BLOOD TRANSFUSION

Abstract
Deaths are not common but they do occur rarely during blood transfusion. Whenever such incidence happens it poses a great problem to the medical persons. Management and investigation of serious adverse reaction poses a great challenge.
Most of the medico-legal problems faced by the doctors are due to the reason that medical records are not properly maintained and there is lack of informed written consent. Patients and their relatives are not prepared to face the adverse reactions particularly death during this process of administration. Whenever such an incidence happens; there is a lot of hue and cry against the doctors. Only proper and timely investigation of the case by the persons well conversant with such investigations can solve the crisis. Recommendations are provided to reduce the unpleasant effects on the career of medical
professional by proper handling of blood transfusion cases.

Keywords: Adverse effects; blood transfusion, blood reaction
©2010 JPAFMAT. All rights reserved

Introduction
Consent for accepting blood transfusion is of paramount importance like any other procedure on the human body.
The comment “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body and the surgeon who performs operation without his (patient’s) consent commits assault for which he is liable in damages” [1] equally applies to blood transfusion.
Blood transfusion is beneficial in many circumstances and may even be life saving. Blood transfusion must be carried out only on precise indications [2] and these indications must be mentioned in the files.
For the safety of blood transfusion step by step procedure must be adopted which should include informed consent, immune-haemotological results, specific prescription about quantity and quality of blood product. [3] In an emergency procedure may be changed but it must be documented. Fact of the blood transfusion must be recorded in the hospital file and this hospital file should be kept in safe custody for a particular period of time as per the laws of the land e.g. in France it is kept for 30 years.The need of blood transfusion has been described as normal cases, special cases, urgent cases and emergency cases.[2]
Transfusion nurses are specially trained in blood transfusion but their availability may not be in all the circumstances.
Blood transfusion can be done by nurse or midwife but clinician must be able to intervene quickly if need arises.[3]
Ethics in blood transfusion are very important and must be followed for safe blood transfusion procedure. In 1980 international society of blood transfusion endorsed first code about the ethics of blood transfusion. [4] This code was adopted by WHO which was later modified in 2000. Only volunteered donations should be accepted and used for patients requiring blood transfusion as Supreme Court has banned professional blood donors.[5]
Jehovas witnesses believe in not using the blood and blood products to save their lives even when it is indicated therapeutically. Blood transfusion against the religious beliefs is problem in emergency situations particularly when the victim is unconscious. It is better to inform the patient about transfusion before operations.[6]

Adverse reactions
Earliest blood transfusion was carried out in 1492 on Pope Innocent VIII to save his life and blood was taken from three 10 years old boys. In this process of transfusion Pope as well as three boys died.[5]It gradually progressed to modern day almost safe well accepted procedure through stages of animal blood transfusion, haemolytic reactions, development of blood groups and cross matching and knowledge of blood carried infections.
Adverse reactions to blood transfusion are not uncommon. This may vary from mild to lethal. Some of these reactions can be prevented and others cannot. These reactions may be acute which occur within 24 hours or may be delayed for days or months. Blood transfusion reactions may be immune mediated or non immune mediated.[7]
There may be haemolytic (intravascular or extra-vascular) or febrile non-haemolytic immune mediated acute
reactions. Other such reactions may be allergic or even anaphylactic reactions. TA –acute lung injury is also seen due to this.
Non immune mediated acute blood transfusion reactions may be seen as physical or chemical damage to RBCs, hyperkalemia and circulatory overload. If the infused blood contains bacteria then there may be bacterial contamination.
Haemolytic reaction can also be result of Immune mediated delayed onset and due to this post transfusion purpura, Imuomodulation and alloimmunization are seen. Transfusion related graft vs host disease is also observed in this group.
Hepatitis B &C, HIV 1&2, syphilis, Malaria and iron overload can be other delayed adverse effects

Treatment of Transfusion reaction
Treatment in these cases must be done as early as possible to avoid charges of negligence. But blood should never be administered without the consent of the person. If the person has ever expressed consent against blood transfusion it should not be carried out as it may result in unfavourable court decisions.[8] In case of transfusion reactions immediately stop the blood transfusion and start the supportive treatment. It is very important to take care of allergic reactions, hypotension, renal failure, hypokalemia and, DIC and start treatment for infections if indicated. It is important to maintain a record of the treatment. Maintaining record is as important as giving treatment in such cases.

Investigation of Transfusion reaction
Investigation in cases of adverse reactions should be done without delay to reach at informative and valuable
conclusions. First thing to see is there is no clerical error in collecting blood or transfusion blood to a wrong person. Blood grouping from the bag and patient should be repeated to rule out any error in grouping. Regrouping is performed on blood samples from the blood bag/tube, pre transfusion and post transfusion samples. Usually ABO and Rh grouping is done on cells and serum grouping is also done. Re- cross matching is performed also on blood samples from the blood bag/tube, pre transfusion and post transfusion samples for IgM and IgG major and minor antibodies by saline, enzymes and IAT. Red cell antibody screening is also performed for pre and post transfusion samples.
Amount of unutilized blood in the bag should be noted carefully and naked eye examination of this blood should be noted.Color and special features of the blood in the bag/tubing of the bag should always be noted and noted that it is normal/purple/clotted to rule out bacterial contamination or haemolysis. Always check the patient’s plasma color of the pre and post-transfusion blood samples. Pink color indicates free hemoglobin due to destruction of RBCs and yellow or brown color indicates bilirubin. Ascertain levels of total free and conjugated levels of bilirubin in post transfusion samples. For this pre transfusion and post transfusion blood samples should be collected, preserved and analyzed. Other tests on pre and post transfusion samples may also help at reaching a conclusion. Increased non-conjugated bilirubin levels post-transfusion samples
(5-7hours to 24 hours), decreased hemoglobin, increased methemoglobin and free hemoglobin levels are also good pointers to blood reaction.
Pre and post transfusion compatibility, IgG loaded erythrocytes, antibodies against blood group antigens, anti A or anti B isoagluttinins, ABO and other than ABO incompatibilities need to be tested. Direct antiglobulin test should be done on the blood of patient as negative test will rule out incompatibility. This blood should be drawn as early as possible as negative test will also be there if it is performed after several hours or if it is non hemolytic reaction. In case of doubtful results; repeat cross match of pre-transfusion and post-transfusion blood sample of patient with donor’s blood by saline, enzyme and IAT methods. Blood should be screened for irregular antibodies. Special test may be indicated in case of detection of irregular antibodies and identification of antibody should be done if possible.
Bacterial smear and bacterial culture of donor’s blood should be performed to rule out bacterial ontamination.
Investigation in fatal cases will depend upon the cause of the complication.[2] Assessment of lethal blood transfusion errors is a multidisciplinary challenge involving forensic medicine, pathology and immune-histochemcial and immunohaematological aspects to detect the incompatible foreign red blood cells in the samples collected during autopsy.[9]
Patients urine collected after blood transfusion reaction should also be checked for free hemoglobin.
All these tests should be preferably counter checked by senior technician if performed by junior technician.
We should rule out both immune and non immune blood transfusion reactions and then also should find about
intrinsic red cell defects.
When investigating about negligence of the treating physician treatment line should also be checked to see that proper supportive treatment has been given for hypotension, renal failure, hyperkalemia disseminated intravascular coagulation and bacterial contamination.
For investigation of delayed onset transfusion adverse effects mean time and time range between administration and sero-conversion must be taken care of infectious diseases. For HIV it is 22 days and 6-38 days, for HCV it is 98 days and 56-189 days, For HBsAg it is 56 days and 24-128 days and HTLV it 51 days and 37-72 days respectively.[7]

Discussion
There is 2%- 5% lethal outcome in blood transfusion in spite of 1:12,000 – 1:36.000 wrong blood transfusions.[9]
Due to inherent dangers in blood transfusion number of legal actions has increased in foreign countries since 5 decades back. [10] It is more likely that this will further increase in the future in India because of more legal awareness and many people successfully suing the doctors to get financial compensation.

Recommendations
Doctor must be aware of the legal basis of blood transfusion. To avoid legal complications the professionals dealing with blood transfusion must follow the national and international guidelines. There should always be a written manual/standard operating procedure of procuring, issuing and administrating transfusion for each institution. From the experience in the medico legalfield it is recommended that following points should be carefully followed:
1. Always take an informed consent.
2. This consent should always be in writing and preferably it should be a witnessed consent and it will of great value in case there is death due to adverse reaction.
3. Blood sample sent for grouping and matching should be properly labelled and this fact should be recorded
in the case file. Request for the blood requirement should preferably be on the proforma of the blood bank
or of the institution and all the details should be filled correctly.
4. Always keep the records that from where blood for transfusion was obtained grouped and matched.
5. Please see that all the required tests have been done on the blood which is being transfused.
6. Check the label properly for blood group and see that this is meant for that particular patient only.
7. Do not administer blood and drugs through a common administration set or inject drugs into blood bag or
use a small bore needle for blood transfusion.
8. In case of blood transfusion reactions always treat promptly and document all the treatment of the patient.
Attending clinician/nurse must be aware of the sign/symptoms of adverse blood reactions. With platelet
infusion particular attention should be towards ill effects of bacterial contamination as platelets are stored
at 200-240 C.
9. Always inform the blood bank in case of adverse reaction along with sign and symptoms of the patient.
10. In case of death do not panic and always inform the police and keep the patient record securely.

Conclusions
Taking care of the all the recommendations will minimize the gravity of the medico-legal adverse effects on the career of the medical person. Proper documentation of the steps taken after the adverse reaction will go a long way in saving the reputation of the medical professionals. Blood transfusion is a well accepted procedure in modern day clinical practice and one should not be afraid of stray cases of litigation due to adverse affects of blood transfusion but the need of the hour is to be well conversant with the law of the land and follow the ethics of blood transfusion
Prof. RK Gorea
MD, DNB, PhD

References
1. Iyer R. The law of torts. 8th Ed. Tripathi publications. p 561.
2. Herbich J. Blood transfusion: medicolegal aspects (author's transl) Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1976; 88(14):437-43.  [PMID: 822588]
3. Pélissier E,Bierling P. What are the rules and regulations for blood product transfusion in France? Rev Prat., 2009 ; 59(1):90-2. [PMID: 19253890]
4. International Society of Blood Transfusion [homepage on the Internet. A code of ethics for blood donation and blood transfusion. [Cited 2009 June 18]. Available from: http://www.isbt-web.org/files/documentation/code_of_ethics.pdf
5. Elhence P.. Ethical issues in transfusion medicine. Indian J Med Ethics.2006;3(3)
http://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/143oa87.html
6. Knudsen F., Guldager H. Blood transfusion and Jehovah's witnesses. Ethical and medicolegal aspects. Ugeskrift for laeger. 1991; 153(9):632-6.
7. Saran RK. Transfusion Medicine Technical Manual, 2nd Ed., 2003. New Delhi: Director General of health services, Ministry of health and family welfare, government of India. p. 127-141.
8. Murkey PN, Khandekar IL, Tirpude BH, Ninave SV. Consent _ Medicolegal aspects. Medico-Legal Update, 2006; 6(4): 10 – 12.
9. Padosch SA, Schmidt PH, Pedal I,Franchy C,Hoch J and Madea B. Medicolegal assessment of blood transfusion errors : An interdisciplinary challenge. Forensic Science International, 2007; 172(1):40-8.
10. Unger L J. Medicolegal aspects of blood transfusion. Survey of anaesthesiology. 1961; 5(1): 31-2. 

Format of Reply by the Doctor/clinic/nursing home/Hospital (Written Statement)

Format of Reply by the Doctor/clinic/nursing home/Hospital (Written Statement)

Before the Hon'ble             Court
In Re: Complaint No.             /2013

X (Full Name and description)                                                  ...................Complainant

V.

Y (full name and Description)                                          .............................Opposite Party

Respectfully showeth:

Preliminary Objections:
(1) That the present complaint is wholly groundless and unsustainable in law and is liable to be dismissed as such.
(2) no jurisdiction
(3) manifestly outside the purview of the said Act
non est, null and void and without jurisdiction
(4) 'Complainant', "consumer dispute", "service" as defined in Section 2 (1) of the said act
(5) baseless and abuse of process of law
(6) no locus standi
(7) bad for non-rejoinder
(8) infructuous
(9) barred by limitation
(10) no territorial/pecuniary jurisdiction
(11) frivolous and vexatious
(12) in accordance with law
(13) medical service free of cost


On merits
(1) Contributory negligence
(2) extra fee
(3) afterthought
(4) gesture of goodwill
(5) concealed previous illness
(6) misconceived
(7)
(8) potential risks known complication




                                                               Opposite Party
                                                                Through .................
                                                                 (Advocate or Consumer Association, etc..)

Place:
Date:

Verification
I.................the respondent above-mentioned, do hereby solemnly state that the contents of my complaint are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein.

Date:
Opposite Party

Complaint Under Section 11(i)/Section 17/Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Complaint Under Section 11(i)/Section 17/Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Before the Hon'ble             Court
In Re: Complaint No.             /2013


X (Full Name and description)                                                  ...................Complainant

V.

Y (full name and Description)                                          .............................Opposite Party

Application Under Section 11 (i)/Section 17/Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

[In-line Notes:
S. 11 (1) Jurisdiction of the District Forum
S. 12.Manner in which complaint shall be made
S. 17.Jurisdiction of the State Commission
S. 21.Jurisdiction of the National Commission]

Respectfully showeth:

(1) INTRODUCTION
In this opening paragraph, the complainant/patient should give his introduction as well as that of the opposite party/parties.
This includes, name , son/daughter of....., aged......years, address, occupation, ........ 

(2) TRANSACTION
In this paragraph, the complainant/patient should describe the transaction complained of, i.e. particulars and details of services availed; kind and nature of service; date of availing of service; amount paid as price; consideration, full or in part towards the service; photocopies of the bill/cash memo/voucher or receipt should be attached and properly marked as Annexure -A, B, C and so forth or 1,2,3 and so forth.

(3) DEFECT DEFICIENCY
In this paragraph, the complainant/patient should explain the grievance i.e whether the loss or damage has been caused by deficiency in service or the doctor has charged excessive fee for the service. One should elucidate the nature of practice adopted by the doctor i.e. relating to the quality of services; the nature and extent of defects in goods should be explained and so should the deficiency in service. One should narrate the grievance and rest assured it is being read/heard by compassionalte and pragmatic judges. Photocopies of relevant documents must be attached.

(4) RECTIFICATION
In this paragraph, the complainant/patient

(5) OTHER PROVISIONS
In the paragraph

(6) EVIDENCE
In this paragraph

(7) JURISDICTION
In this paragraph

(8) LIMITATION
That the present complaint is being filed within the period prescribed under Section 24 A of the Act.

(9) RELIEF CLAIMED
In this paragraph,

(10) PRAYER CLAUSE
It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Forum/Commission may kindly be pleased to .......... (Details of relief which complainant wants the Forum/Commission to grant)



                                                               Complainant
                                                                Through .................
                                                                 (Advocate or Consumer Association, etc..)

Place:
Date:

Verification
I.................the complainant above-mentioned, do hereby solemnly state that the contents of my complaint are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein.

Date:
Complainant



Format of Application for seeking permission to file single complaint on behalf of various consumers having common interest

Before the Hon'ble Court
In re: Complaint No.             /2013

X (Full name and description)                           .....................Complainant

V.

Y (Full name and description)                      ........................Opposite party

Application under S. 2(1)(b)(iv)/S. 12 (c)/S. 13 (6) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 read with Order 1 Rule 8, sub-rule (1)(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure Code 1908

Respectfully showeth:
1. That the complainant above named have filed the accompanying complaint the contents of which are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity may be read as an integral part of this application also.

2. That the complainants above named have suffered financial loss/mental agony, etc. on account of deficiency in services rendered ...and the nature of the grievance suffered is identical. In fact, the evidence which the complainants crave leave to produce at an appropriate stage, is also identical. Accordingly, the complainants have the same interest in the above complaint.

3. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in order to meet the ends of justice and to effectually adjudicate the present dispute, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Forum/Commission may kindly be pleased to grant permission to complainants to institute and prosecute the present complaint through...for and on behalf of and for the benefit of all the complainants. Any other order which this Hon'ble Forum/Commission may deem fit and proper, may also be passed.

Place                                                Complainants
Date

HIV Right to Marry

The 21 st day of September 1998 (1) has been a black hole in the judicial and human rights history of India. This day marked the judicial murder of the very basic natural and humanitarian rights of the persons suffering from HIV/ AIDS. Their very right to marry, found a family and procreate was snatched away by the very 'sentinel of justice'. This judicial murder did not stop here. It culminated with the snatching away of the right to privacy of the PWHA (2). 

In the year 2003 the Supreme Court (3) restored the right to marry of the PWHA. This was indeed a welcome step and was received with great appreciation. The Supreme Court restored the earlier position i.e. the PWHA were granted the right to marry and found a family. However one pertinent question, which remains still unanswered- " The right to privacy and confidentiality of the PWHA."

Therefore the need arises that the proposition laid down in C.A. No. 4641/1998 and the I.A. for clarification/ direction should be evaluated to ascertain the threat, which still persists pertaining to violation of their rights.

Facts of the Case -

Mr. X was a doctor in government service from a well-known family in a North East state of India. He was asked to accompany an uncle of a minister of his state on official duty for surgical treatment to a well-known hospital in the southern part of India. During the surgery the uncle required blood. The complainant was requested to give blood. He was asked to be ready and his blood sample was taken. However his blood was not used with out assigning any reason. After the surgery was over they returned back. Later his marriage was proposed with one Ms. Y. Both families and the minister also approved the match. They were officially engaged. The hospital authorities had no knowledge of the proposed marriage. But without any reason they informed the minister that the Mr. X was HIV + ve. The minister told his sister that the marriage would have to be called off. When Mr. X came to know about it he volunteered for the confirmation test. On getting the confirmation he returned and the marriage was called off. However by this time every one knew the sero status of Mr.X. He was severely ostracised and had to quit his job and his home state. Being aggrieved he moved the consumer forum for the breach of duty by disclosure and consequent liability of the hospital. The NCDRC asked Mr. X to approach a civil court. However he preferred an appeal to the Supreme Court. (8)

Proposition laid down in Mr. X v. Hospital Z (1998) - 

1. Right to marry is a suspended in cases of PWHA.
2. Infringement of such suspended right cannot be legally compensated.
3. Disclosure of the 'sero-status' does not violate the right to confidentiality as the life of Ms. Y was saved.
4. Duty is cast upon the PWHA not to marry by Ss. 269 & 270 of the I.P.C.

Right to marry suspended -
The Apex Court has held that PWHA have no right to marry. The basis of the finding was that the personal laws provide as a ground for divorce when one spouse is suffering from communicable vulnerable disease. Thus when one party is suffering from communicable vulnerable disease there cannot be a lawful marriage.

Further the Court held that the object of marriage is sex. As AIDS is a product of undisciplined sexual impulse, sex with PWHA is to be avoided; the Court cannot assist those persons in achieving that object.

With due respect to the above observations, it is humbly submitted that this observation of the Hon'ble Court is devoid of any merit and made in the gross ignorance of the facts of the case. 

There is no provision in any personal law wherein marriage between two person, either one or both suffering from any form of communicable vulnerable disease is prohibited. Hence on this ground declaring the right to marry as suspended is untenable. Further the Court even did not realise that what if both parties are suffering from HIV/ AIDS. 

The second ground for declaring the right to marry as a suspended right was based on the ground that AIDS is an outcome of undisciplined sexual impulse and to prevent it from transmitting right to marry should be suspended. In this regard I would like to make two clarifications - 

a) sex is not the absolute object of marriage.(4)
b) AIDS is not solely the outcome of undisciplined sexual impulse. (5)
It is a sad and terrifying situation if the Apex Court of any land bases its observation on such grounds.

Compensation for such suspended right-
The Supreme Court has held that, "infringement of a "suspended right to marry" cannot be legally compensated by damages either in Torts or Common law, is our answer to this problem raised in this appeal which is based on the peculiar facts of its own".

The above ground for rejection of the appeal is totally uncalled, for the real issues before the Consumer Foras as well as the Supreme Court was that there was a breach of confidentiality or not. The Supreme Court on a self conceived imaginary notion, which was totally erroneous, made an observation on the issue of damages for calling off the marriage.

Disclosure of sero status-
The Supreme Court justified the disclosure of the sero status of the Appellant to a minister whose uncle the appellant had accompanying for treatment. Due to this the Appellant was severely and had to quit his home state. The disclosure was justified as the Supreme Court imagined that such disclosure saved the life of Ms.Y, the fiancée of Mr.X.

With due respect it is again submitted that had the Court before making such observation inquired into the facts there would not have been a miscarriage of justice in such abominable fashion.

Duty not to marry-
The Court did not stop here rather it proceeded on and declared that there is a duty cast upon the PWHA not to marry. In case they marry they shall face penal consequences imposed by S.269 and S.270 of the I.P.C.

It is submitted with due respect that such marriage is neither a negligent (6) nor a malignant (7) act. It is also pertinent to note that in cases of discordant couples sexual transmission of HIV can be lowered to 0.01% by safe penetrative sex, by consistent and correct use of condoms. Further in case of mother to child transmission, it is medically possible to reduce the transmission of HIV during pregnancy from 33% to 2%.

Position as laid down in I.A. for clarification \ direction in C.A. NO. 4641\1998 -
1) The Court directed the W.P. u\Art32 to be treated as an I.A. for clarification \ directions in C.A. No. 4641\1998.
2) The disclosure was justified in the circumstances of the case.
3) The following observation made by Court in C.A.No.4641\1998 were unnecessary as the Court did not give notice to either parties concerned-

a) right to privacy
b) criminal liability on marriage
c) right to confidentiality
d) the right to marriage is suspended during the period of illness.

The above observations hit the headlines but not in toto. Everywhere it was reported that PWHA have right to marry, 'right to marry restored'. However, the situation is not as simple as it seems.

The right to privacy, confidentiality, and disclosure are still not conclusively restored. There is every chance that these rights of PWHA may be invaded and such intrusion may be defended on the basis of the judgement and clarification issued by the Hon'ble Court in C.A.No.4641\1998.

The Hon'ble Court has held in the C.A. No. 4641\1998 that "...the observations made by this Court, except to the extent of holding as stated earlier that the appellant's right was not affected in any manner in revealing his HIV +ve status to the relatives of his fiancé, are uncalled for .We dispose off these applications with these observations".

It has been stated clearly earlier that such disclosure was uncalled for. Therefore for the sake of brevity it is necessary that the far-reaching consequences and effects of this observation by the court be examined. The following may be the effects of the observation.

Ad-hoc Justice-
The law laid down by the Supreme Court is final till the legislature or the Court itself changes it. In this process of doing justice if any injustice is done to the parties then such unjust law prevails till it is impeached. In this case the Hon'ble Court did not conclusively settle the matter but an ad-hoc course was resorted to.
Whereby the Court did not appreciate the case properly. The need of the hour is to determine the rights and obligations of the PWHA conclusively. The Hon'ble Court could have clearly laid down the law on disclosure by issuing \ framing guidelines for the same.

A dangerous weapon against the PWHA-
The observation of the Hon'ble Court might have far reaching consequences than what can be imagined at this stage. The Court has clarified that the proposition made in the Appeal pertaining to privacy and confidentiality were uncalled for. However one must keep in mind that the Court has justified the disclosure, on what ground-it has not been discussed therein.

It is impossible to imagine about the right to privacy and right to confidentiality when the Court has justified the right to disclosure of the sero-status to any third person.

A need for Reconsideration-
The observation of the Supreme Court in C.A. No. 4641\1998 and its I.A. for clarification needs reconsideration if it wants to stand tall in the eyes of the law-abiding citizens as a 'sentinel on a qui vive'.
****************************
Reference: -
1. Mr. X v. Hospital Z - C.A. No. 4641/ 1998 (1998) 8 SCC 296
2. PWHA- Persons with HIV / AIDS
3. AIR 2003 (SC) 664
4. Though sex is an essential aspect of marriage, however it is not the sole object of marriage.
5. HIV/ AIDS may be communicated even by blood transfusion (through a contaminated needle) and by birth. 
6. see- Rakma { I.L.R Bom. 11}
7. The Hon'ble Court did not consider the case where two persons suffering from HIV/ AIDS or in a case where one of the couple is discordant and with knowledge of the disease they marry each other and are willing to take preventive measures. 
8. www.hri.ca/partners/lc

Consumer Forum Response

Assume that you have received a notice from State Consumer Forum as a consequence of the case filed by your patient against you on the ground of medical negligence. Briefly outline the procedure you are expected to Follow.

Plaint Order VII
Notice
Response within 30 days
Further extension requested for 30 days
Written Statement Under Order VIII Rule
Set-off, counter-complaint

Contributory negligence
Pecuniary Jurisdiction 20 Lakhs to 1 Crore

Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Central Government Act
Section 269 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
269. Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life.-- Whoever unlawfully or negligently does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both.